Richard is correct. As part of the discussions of the Change Proposal on this 
topic earlier this year, in SPDX 3.0 and going forward, `AdditionRef-` is the 
agreed-upon prefix to use for custom license additions.

These are intended to be used for additional text which is appended to a 
license, but which is not itself a standalone license. It might be a true 
“exception” / additional permission, or could be any other sort of additional 
text (such as an additional restriction).

More details are currently available at [1] and [2].

I presume this will not be backported into SPDX 2.3, since that would be a 
substantive change. For SPDX 3.0 I believe the pending question is around how 
the License Expression Syntax annex [3] and other ancillary materials will be 
ported into the SPDX 3.0 repos.

Best,
Steve


[1] https://github.com/spdx/change-proposal/issues/4#issuecomment-1526155230
[2] https://github.com/spdx/change-proposal/issues/4#issuecomment-1536426018 
(though the links in this comment are no longer valid due to subsequent 
refactoring of the draft spdx-3-model repo)
[3] https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/SPDX-license-expressions/

> On Sep 24, 2023, at 11:05 PM, Richard Fontana <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> SPDX 3.0 will (if I understand the situation correctly) support an
> `AdditionRef-` construct - see:
> https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/153
> 
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 9:29 PM Peter Monks <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> G'day everyone,
>> 
>> I developed an SPDX expression parser, based on the ABNF grammar in annex D 
>> of version 2.3 of the SPDX specification, and I recently came across an 
>> unusual case that gave me pause.  Basically someone had put a LicenseRef in 
>> the exception-identifier position:
>> 
>> GPL-3.0-or-later WITH LicenseRef-Additional-Permission
>> 
>> Now clearly this is not a valid expression according to the ABNF, but I 
>> wondered if perhaps it, or something like it, should be, or (alternatively) 
>> if there's a good reason it's not allowed?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for any insights,
>> Peter
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1771): https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/1771
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/101566951/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/leave/2655439/21656/1698928721/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to