I'm just catching up on holiday mail and wanted to add another +1 to separation of Discovery from AuthN. The sooner the better.
=Drummond _____ From: specs-boun...@openid.net [mailto:specs-boun...@openid.net] On Behalf Of David Fuelling Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 8:47 AM To: Nat Sakimura Cc: John Bradley; specs@openid.net Subject: Re: Proposal to form Discovery Working Group On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> wrote: 2. Separation of OP into Discovery Service and Authentication Service. In the current terminology, OP spans both Discovery Service and Authentication Service. We should be explicit about it. +1. I would like to see discovery services separated from OP services too. John Bradley wrote: > Breno, > > I agree. I recommended separating discovery into a separate doc for > 2.1. > > There didn't seem to be support for the idea at the time, perhaps > circumstances have changed and the idea will be accepted now. > > Regards > John Bradley > =jbradley
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs