I'd advocate for waiting until all of the discovery work occurring in
OASIS, IETF, and W3C shakes out before we make changes to how OpenID
discovery works. I'd much rather make this sort of change once rather
than twice.
--David
On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Drummond Reed wrote:
I’m just catching up on holiday mail and wanted to add another +1 to
separation of Discovery from AuthN. The sooner the better…
=Drummond
From: specs-boun...@openid.net [mailto:specs-boun...@openid.net] On
Behalf Of David Fuelling
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 8:47 AM
To: Nat Sakimura
Cc: John Bradley; specs@openid.net
Subject: Re: Proposal to form Discovery Working Group
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-
sakim...@nri.co.jp> wrote:
2. Separation of OP into Discovery Service and Authentication Service.
In the current terminology, OP spans both Discovery Service and
Authentication Service.
We should be explicit about it.
+1. I would like to see discovery services separated from OP
services too.
John Bradley wrote:
> Breno,
>
> I agree. I recommended separating discovery into a separate doc for
> 2.1.
>
> There didn't seem to be support for the idea at the time, perhaps
> circumstances have changed and the idea will be accepted now.
>
> Regards
> John Bradley
> =jbradley
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
