Charles,
I will get this info for you. Is it a BAD idea to make the file read
only as some on this list have suggested. Does this exacerbate the
problem since it might keep trying to update?
Thanks
Lanny Udey
Hofstra University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Charles Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, July 06, 2000 >>>
Ok, here's a question- how big is the file itself? When a browser hits
the
site, there is a struct by user agent that it uses to locate the
browser.
Assuming its not found, it attempts to do parenting to assign itself to
the
correct browser parent. Perhaps it is running through a massive number
of
potential parents? If so, it maybe that we have to do something like
limit
the depth of searching or something to make sure it doesn't recurse
through
the whole tree. . .
-c
-----Original Message-----
From: Lanny R. Udey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
Charles,
We are having MAJOR problems with the 1.01 version and we have been
working with tech support but have not really gotten anywhere. We
today
locked the file and tried to access it with Netscape 4.5 for Win 95
(at
least one of the browsers that are giving reproducable problems) and
the
following happened. The file was not corrupted obviously, but the CPU
utilization went through the roof as before. When we restarted the
server, since the browser.wddx file was OK things returned to normal.
This is a go live show stopper for us and we really need to get this
resolved ASAP.
Thanks for looking into this personally.
Lanny Udey
Hofstra University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Charles Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wednesday, July 05, 2000 >>>
(Sorry I'm replying late- I've been on holiday) A question for you-
the
cfa_browser tag in 10 definitely had exactly the behavior you
describe.
It
was fixed for 101- unrecognized browsers should be handled fine (it
was
posted on the forums by a gracious developer, though I can't recall
who).
Was this 10 or 101?
-c
-----Original Message-----
From: Tristan Roddis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 5:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
Not surprising that a whole server-side application can break so
fundamentally simply by being sent http requests by a browser? It
astounds
me! (not to mention irritates, annoys, angers, depresses...)
-T.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 9:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
>
>
> Being that NN6 is in Beta that's not surprising!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
