One problem I've seen with the browser.wddx file - which seemed to cause 
Spectra to hang on it - is that a struct element is created with an empty 
key - for instance, stBrowser[''].  I did not look into why this happened 
or what part of the code caused a problem, but removing that key (both from 
the file and the in-memory struct) seemed to clear things up.

Just mentioning it in case it helps ...

-- David

At 08:48 AM 7/7/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>I think it would be bad idea to do that- if it errors writing to the browser
>file is swallows and keeps chugging.  This means, however, that there is
>potential that it would have to try to write each request.  If you aren't
>seeing corruption in the file itself, then I think keeping it writable is
>ok.  If there is corruption, we should get to the bottom of that!
>
>-c
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lanny R. Udey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
>
>
>Charles,
>
>I will get this info for you. Is it a BAD idea to make the file read
>only as some on this list have suggested. Does this exacerbate the
>problem since it might keep trying to update?
>
>Thanks
>Lanny Udey
>Hofstra University
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> Charles Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, July 06, 2000 >>>
>Ok, here's a question- how big is the file itself?  When a browser hits
>the
>site, there is a struct by user agent that it uses to locate the
>browser.
>Assuming its not found, it attempts to do parenting to assign itself to
>the
>correct browser parent.  Perhaps it is running through a massive number
>of
>potential parents?  If so, it maybe that we have to do something like
>limit
>the depth of searching or something to make sure it doesn't recurse
>through
>the whole tree. . .
>
>-c
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lanny R. Udey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
>
>
>Charles,
>
>We are having MAJOR problems with the 1.01 version and we have been
>working with tech support but have not really gotten anywhere. We
>today
>locked the file and tried to access it with Netscape 4.5 for Win 95
>(at
>least one of the browsers that are giving reproducable problems) and
>the
>following happened. The file was not corrupted obviously, but the CPU
>utilization went through the roof as before. When we restarted the
>server, since the browser.wddx file was OK things returned to normal.
>This is a go live show stopper for us and we really need to get this
>resolved ASAP.
>
>Thanks for looking into this personally.
>
>Lanny Udey
>Hofstra University
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> Charles Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wednesday, July 05, 2000 >>>
>(Sorry I'm replying late- I've been on holiday) A question for you-
>the
>cfa_browser tag in 10 definitely had exactly the behavior you
>describe.
>  It
>was fixed for 101- unrecognized browsers should be handled fine (it
>was
>posted on the forums by a gracious developer, though I can't recall
>who).
>Was this 10 or 101?
>
>-c
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tristan Roddis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 5:39 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
>
>
>Not surprising that a whole server-side application can break so
>fundamentally simply by being sent http requests by a browser? It
>astounds
>me! (not to mention irritates, annoys, angers, depresses...)
>
>-T.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 9:35 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Completely broken webtop
> >
> >
> > Being that NN6 is in Beta that's not surprising!
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
>
>
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>'unsubscribe' in the body.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
>
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>'unsubscribe' in the body.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
>
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>'unsubscribe' in the body.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>'unsubscribe' in the body.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>'unsubscribe' in the body.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To Unsubscribe visit 
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk 
>or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
>'unsubscribe' in the body.

-------------------------------------------------
David An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- life through a browser --    
MINDSEYE Technology, Inc.   http://www.mindseye.com/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Reply via email to