All-
At work I recently inherited a mid-sized content management system from a
consulting organization in Boston. The system is built using ZERO meta-data
and makes use of content types for categorization of content (Resulting in
multiple content types of the same structure, just a different name. In case
you were wondering, this makes content mgmt of any sort by non-technical
personnel an impossibility not to mention being useless when it comes to
personalization)
This seems to me a great waste of Spectra's capabilities. Can anyone make a
guess as to why this was done? Has anyone else built a personalized cms on
spectra without using meta-data? Has anyone else come across an
implementation of Spectra that does not follow ANY of allaire's best
practices? While we're at it let's buy plans for a house, throw them away
and build the house with match sticks and a glue gun.
Has anyone elses' company spent $15k for a system just for the pretty box
and the neat Quick Reference book?
just curious. and fuming. demons of stupidity and un-maintainableness- be
gone! (yes I made up that last word.)
"Hey, look at me! I know ColdFusion!"
-- unknown.
Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
