I couldn't possibly comment on why spectra caching was designed this way. It
would be nicer if it was in the same methodology as <cfquery> cachedwithin
is done. In fact, the documentation on the cache timeout is so confusing
that I had to read the code to work out how it works...
cheers,
Aaron.
/****************************************
Aaron Shurmer
Senior Developer
Daemon Internet Consultants
ph +61 (0) 2 9380 4162
http://www.daemon.com.au/
engineered.innovation
****************************************/
-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Wheat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2001 12:31 PM
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: RE: Caching
What would be reasoning behind such a whacked method? Surely developers
will always know how long the cache is to live for (ie, 30mins), rather than
this expiry timestamp thing... From a useability point of view, specifying
the timeout period is much easier. Functionally, whether the conversion
function is insde or outside of the tag should be of little consequence.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
