Clark,

Would you agree if i would say that these answers are not realy something
that i can tell my customers.
" Dear customer we are going to upgrade you in q4, as far as we know...." It
would really make a difference if macromedia would release some kind of
statement. Be open... if they are not planning to do anything... okay... but
at least... we can tell the customer something... instead of .... well....
AFAIK.....

Get my point?

Finn

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: RE: 1.5.2 summary please?


>> * Make Spectra work under ColdFusion MX without siteminder

Yes

>> * Reprogramming of the code to use ColdFusion Components.

AFAIK, yes as CFC's were alledgedly born from the redevelopment of
Spectra.

>> * Q4 2002.

Again, yes AFAIK








Neil Clark
Team Macromedia
http://www.macromedia.com/go/team

Announcing Macromedia MX!!
http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial/




-----Original Message-----
From: J�rgen Sundvor Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 08:02
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: 1.5.2 summary please?


What I understand that the 1.5.2 upgrade will do is:
.

What I had _hoped_ would be covered (because it would make Spectra
cool again) but I understand won't be is:

Release date:

Is this correct?

Many thanks,
J�rgen Sundvor Smith


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.funkdancer.com/
mobile 0409 012 484 or +61 409 012 484


______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Reply via email to