Hi Garry, no other child models of the device lose contact on the rfc2790. Just different devices lose contact on the rfc2790 and I think this is causing false monitored processes alarms to be generated.
Thanks. Regards, Nino 2008/9/30 Garry Harst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sounds like it may be an SNMP issue which could possbily be an issue with > the SNMP on the device - do any other child models of the device also lose > contact of just the rfc2790? > > Are the devices you are monitoring Windows devices? > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Nino Romeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we are facing a problem with process monitoring having continuous *false >> * process stop alarms. >> >> *We are running Spectrum 8.1 H14* >> >> Reading through the Events List on those devices we can see these >> rfc2790App stop respondings quite often: >> >> >> *Application "devicename_Host Resources "of type rfc2790App has stopped >> responding to polls and/or external requests. An alarm will be generated. >> * >> >> * * >> >> and then >> >> >> >> *Application "devicename_Host Resources of type rfc2790App has started >> responding to polls and/or external requests. * >> >> * * >> >> >> and also those processes which are currently monitored going down and up >> continuously while they had never get stopped or started in real. >> It is happening not only for one device but on some devices (that's why I >> wrote a generic "devicename" above. >> >> I am wondering whether it could be better to monitor those processes >> throught the SystemEDGE agent and >> not throught the Spectrum Process Monitoring. >> >> >> Did anyone face the same problem? >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Nino Romeo >> >> >> >> >> 2008/9/12 Warich, Juergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> we use the process monitoring with more or less no problems. >>> >>> In case you just want to monitor that a process is running(e.g. sshd), >>> then disable the checkbox for alert on start/stop. Define the min and max >>> occurance and that's it. >>> >>> Alerts initated by alert on start or stop will not be cleared >>> automatically once the process is running again. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jürgen >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Wagner, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. September 2008 23:04 >>> An: spectrum >>> Betreff: [spectrum] Experience in process monitoring >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> What is your experience in process monitoring RFC2790 with spectrum. >>> >>> For me it always detected a fault process. >>> But I often get an alarm which has to be manually cleared when I restart >>> the process. >>> >>> I use the monitor this process but I also tried it with Less than 1 an >>> more than 2. >>> >>> We use 8.1 sp1. >>> >>> Does anybody have this problem to that the process alarm is still visible >>> in spite of the process is running again since long time. >>> >>> Thanks Frank >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the >>> body: unsubscribe spectrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> --- >>> To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the >>> body: unsubscribe spectrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> - --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >> the body: unsubscribe spectrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --- To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body: unsubscribe spectrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
