--- In [email protected], "rubikorkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have noticed that almost EVERYBODY used a EF LL. I am one of the > few, the proud, the CF users. How many *good* cubers are there that > actually use a CFLL. I don't think CF is any harder or longer, so I > wonder why so few people use it.
> I met someone in ORLANDO who used CLL, ELL. I was very impressed with the speed. CLL/ELL is very comparable to OLL/PLL, but you never get hard PLLS. I am interested in replacing CFOP with the Roux method as my main method. So I need to start learning COLL, or CLL. If anyone can help out with CLL algs I'd appreciate it Jason Kovacic [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS is CLL faster than COLL? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
