Yeah, I know your method is a cycle method...but, you didn't answer my question...With that thing, you can take a non-lucky case and make it be a lucky case. And is that considered lucky? Pedro
Stefan Pochmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: --- In [email protected], Pedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, and there's one more thing: > > A while ago, Stefan posted something to people who use cycle > method for BLD. You can manipulate the centers to have a better CO. Little correction: that was intended for *any* 3x3 BLD method. I just see a larger advantage for those who orient and permute separately. I don't see a big advantage for my own method, which, btw, *is* a cycle method, too. As far as I know, only Dave Orser and Richard Carr might be doing something different than cycle-methods, but they do orient first, so my idea certainly applied to their method, too! Cheers! Stefan --------------------------------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "speedsolvingrubikscube" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
