x-cross  stnads for extended cross and means that you build the 
cross and the first pair in one go. I usually build a 2*2*2 and then 
finish with the two last edges while I'm looking for pair #2.

/Gunnar

--- In [email protected], Gilles van den 
Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a question :
> What is the difference between a cross and an x-cross ?
> 
> 
> 2005/12/4, Gunnar Krig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It seems pretty onteresting indeed. I've done 10.42 on average 
for
> > F2L, but my biggest problem is the cross that often takes ~3
> > seconds. If I can choose among two different start I will 
probably
> > get easy crosses and x-crosses much more often, and I think I can
> > lower my avg alot, just like you Chris.
> >
> > I'll definitely give it a try!!
> >
> > /Gunnar
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Joël van Noort
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's pretty interesting, Chris. Maybe I'll give it a go :).
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], cmhardw
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I am by no means an expert at the F2L.  I think I used to 
average
> > > > around 11-12 seconds before switching to opposite color + 
Xcross
> > > combo
> > > > solving.
> > > >
> > > > Well I took an F2L average tonight and am now sub-10!  All I
> > > changed
> > > > from my 11-12 second averages was to add in opposite color
> > solving.
> > > >
> > > > Now I am pretty nearly 1-(1-x)^2 times more likely to get 
good
> > > solves
> > > > (where x is my good solve frequency on one color) as I used 
to
> > be.
> > > > That is very, very noticeable!!  Of course I can't always 
notice
> > > well
> > > > setup Xcross's on my opposite color, but I can always spot a 
good
> > > > cross.  I hope to change that soon with more practice and 
always
> > > spot
> > > > the good opposite color Xcross solves.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway here was the average:
> > > > 11.50, 8.86, 9.69, 10.18, 10.78, (7.20), 9.41, (12.68), 
11.20,
> > > 7.94,
> > > > 9.62, 8.36 = 9.75 seconds
> > > >
> > > > The thing is, I am not a sub-10 F2L solver if I solve the 
same
> > > color
> > > > every time.  However, with the combination of opposite color 
as
> > > well
> > > > as Xcross, and not just Xcross, I can now call myself a sub-
10
> > F2L
> > > > solver :-)
> > > >
> > > > Think what you already sub-10 solvers could do with opposite
> > color
> > > > solving ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to