Congratulations Sander, it looks like we're gonna have a high record in Belgium :-)
About the Lucky cases, it's hard to tell because with Stefan's Method : you have 2 kind of lucky cases : - the one you like (skipping steps) - the ones you don't like (cases that makes you change the method) So if the "luck" you have is of the second type, i'd say "non-lucky" (because you actually don't use them), but of course if you skip 5 steps...that's kind of lucky... Gilles. 2006/1/16, sander hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > i was doing an average on the clock... > first 12 solves were: > > 9,61 9,81 9,27 9,69 10,36 10,83 10,14 10,41 9,83 10,16 > 8,39 7,83 > (average 9,77 sec) > > I already asked Stefan some time ago what he thinks is > lucky and not lucky when solving the clock. i agreed > with him that skipping 1 or 2 out of 14 steps isn't > lucky since it happens a lot. i don't know the exact > probability, but i solved plenty to know it happens a > lot :-) > the 7,83 time had 2 steps skipped in the front cross > and all other steps had to be done, but of course the > corners at the back were extremely easy too. (twice 1, > once 10 and once 11 o' clock or something, which goes > very very fast) > yet i'm not sure wether i should post it or not... but > then again, if you make sure you solve like a > gazillion, you are sure to get an easy case from time > to time. > so what do you guys think should be considered lucky > for the clock? > > sander > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
