--- In [email protected], Lars Petrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You're of course right that it's only for meaningful positions. I'm
> not sure it invalidates my claim, but maybe it does.
>
> I would argue that to a cuber, all cube positions are meaningful.
> Just the fact that they're random doesn't mean they're hard to
> memorize/recognize. But maybe it is somehow fundamentally a much
> bigger harder problem in some way.
I think it is a fundamentally different thing. Of course you can take
a scrambled cube and interpret some meaning into it (e.g. the four
corner orientations in the L layer look like "the wheel") but so can
the chess masters for random chess boards (e.g. those three pieces are
lined up as "pin").
A chess game always starts with the same state (unless we're talking
about Fischer's random chess) and goes on from that in meaningful
ways. A cube on the other hand starts scrambled, i.e. is meaningless
right from the start, and only becomes "more meaningful" the closer
you get to the solved state.
> I got the "fraction of a second" from memory, and as you found that
> memory was a exaggerated by a factor of 10. Make your own 'irony'
joke.
Ok... um... damn... I'm not good at joking when I'm expected to. I
also can't tell jokes.
> Are there any other comparable cases of instant recognition that
> people do? I haven't had my coffee, so I can't think of any. I'm
> thinking less of conscious memorizing of symbols and more about
> things that plugs into our instinctive abilities. That's often
> thousand of times faster.
An important aspect is that we're looking for *exact* memorization.
You can't make a single mistake or else you'll get DNF. Also, the
memorized object should be "random" and have many different possible
states.
I can't think of any right now, either. Anyone?
Cheers!
Stefan
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/