--- In [email protected], "Gunnar Krig"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan!
>
> Aren't you gonna try megaminx blindfolded again?? I can see that, if
> it will take you some 5 hours, you don't think it's worth the
effort,
> but it would be cool if you could lower the record with a few hours
:-)
>
> How hard was it to do compared with, say 5*5*5?? Did you go slow
> during the solve to be sure you didn't mess up anything?
>
> /Gunnar
Yes, one day I want to solve megaminx blindfolded again, and much
faster. I have better ideas for execution now, but I'm too lazy to
practice memorization techniques. I want to become better at that
before I try some larger blindsolving things again.
I stepped right from 3x3 to megaminx, no 4x4 or 5x5 in between. The
megaminx was my first real heavy usage of a memorization technique.
That's why it took so long. Also, it's harder to setup pieces. I can't
say what's harder, 5x5 or megaminx, one is easier this way, the other
is easier that way.
Hey Chris, you're funny :-). Did you really not know about these
techniques and records until now? I somewhat thought it's common
knowledge at least among the blindcubers now. Btw, why did you ask
that memorizer about memorizing the cube through numbers again? It's
so obvious he'll tell you to *not* use numbers.
Cheers!
Stefan
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
