--- In [email protected], "thomkirjava"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been pretty much using mefferts method for a bit now, but I'm
> sure there's a much better one.
>
> Good puzzle, bad methods. I'm sure there is a better one.
What is so bad about it? Presumably the authors wanted to present a
simple solution method that could be learnt relatively easily. Their
leaflet does that job.
Would it be appropriate for Rubik's Cube to be boxed with a hefty
manual describing the Fridrich method -- and nothing simpler?
Mike
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
