Of course, but it's no good for speedsolving. It does well just as a method to solve the puzzle. I can't find any others described. Apart form jaap's other one, and I don't understand that...
meh... ~Thom --- In [email protected], mike_go_uk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "thomkirjava" > <snkenjoi@> wrote: > > I've been pretty much using mefferts method for a bit now, but I'm > > sure there's a much better one. > > > > Good puzzle, bad methods. I'm sure there is a better one. > > What is so bad about it? Presumably the authors wanted to present a > simple solution method that could be learnt relatively easily. Their > leaflet does that job. > > Would it be appropriate for Rubik's Cube to be boxed with a hefty > manual describing the Fridrich method -- and nothing simpler? > > Mike > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
