Michael Blatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > - closed-source kernel -> the interesting bits of code needed are not > accessible
closed source kernel is not a problem if we have access to good API documentations. But supporting non Free OS is not my main goal. > - no one asked about it before true > - developers not interested mostly true. Solaris for x86 is just a shame. It's slow, lacking many features from the sparc version. Moreover i don't know any developer who has a solaris box installed. Btw, the driver does not use assembly, so the port would be to all Solaris architectures not just x86. > - AFAIK GNU pppd can be used on Solaris, so maybe the driver uses > features unsupported by the OS? We did nerver look at it, so i can't tell you > Which of these, if any, applies, and if none, then what is the reason? I think the main reason for me, is that i see no interest in using solaris x86. If i had a sparc station, i would change my mind but that's not the case so... -- Edouard Gomez -- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+IgD/R5dTYz5sWMcRArYXAJ9jM50ZZblU8dwMFWCLrKThSJXJUACgvtdx JbRZZA82R3e6ZNS67S29GyI= =i6m8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se d�sinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
