-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: SPF Record Syntax Date: Sunday, 25. June 2006 10:21 From: "Monte Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topic: Other Name: Monte Hansen Organization: Stashsoft Hello from sunny California! We're working on an SPF implementation for our spam filter and noticed an ambiguity on the Mechanism Syntax result/explanation. This statement: fail - The SPF record does not designate the host to be allowed to send can easily be interpreted as the absence of an action specified, and confused with the result "none" (described above it). This is in the "passive voice" which describes an "inaction", whereas I believe the record is explicitly stating that "The SPF record has designated the host as NOT being allowed to send." If I am incorrect then I would greatly appreciate understanding the errors of my ways (before releasing our SPF implementation =). Respectfully submitted, Monte Hansen - -- Message was sent via the SPF website contact form <http://new.openspf.org/Contact> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEnnTIwL7PKlBZWjsRAqi+AJ4svcpViGhdRTfs6LOF6Ksj7LjmeACfdHli 1pk9QnBYljaXt0wwLc1PIkk= =fVAy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
