Julian Mehnle wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> Subject: SPF Record Syntax
> Date: Sunday, 25. June 2006 10:21
> From: "Monte Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
....
>
> This statement:
> fail - The SPF record does not designate the host to be allowed to send
>
> can easily be interpreted as the absence of an action specified, and
> confused with the result "none" (described above it). This is in the
> "passive voice" which describes an "inaction", whereas I believe the
> record is explicitly stating that "The SPF record has designated the host
> as NOT being allowed to send."
I changed the wording on http://new.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax
Gr,
Koen
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, hosting, embedded systems, unix, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
