On Sep 10, 2008, at 11:16 AM, chris wrote:
> > This would be great added functionality. My only concern would be the > dependencies when distributing something. I think it's more likely > that that people (at least in my audience) would have latex installed > than ReportLab. I recently started using sphinx to produce HTML and PDF output for some documentation at work. I have a nice HTML template, but am using the default PDF rendering because I don't know enough about LaTeX to have a clue how to change them. I would have liked to have another option for PDF generation, especially if it gave me more control over the output. Would creating templates for ReportLab be "easier" than for LaTeX? > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM, ralsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Hello, I am one of the authors of a tool to generate PDFs straight >> from Restructured Text without passing through LaTeX. >> >> I played a little with Sphinx trying to get a PDF version of the >> Django docs, and am having partial success. Is there interest from >> the >> Sphinx developers in having this work? I know **I** am interested :-) >> >> Here's an example of the output I got from Django docs using the >> default stylesheet (the too-small images are an artifact which is >> easy >> to fix): >> >> http://lateral.netmanagers.com.ar/static/30.pdf >> >> You can find more information about rst2pdf at http://rst2pdf.googlecode.com >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
