Georg,

Georg Brandl wrote:
> Werner F. Bruhin schrieb:
>
>   
>>> Of course it was two different problems. :)
>>>
>>> In your case, it seems that your searchtools.js is not the one that is 
>>> shipped
>>> with 0.5.1 -- the problem is that the page sources are missing.
>>>
>>> Can you check if the searchtools.js is properly copied in the output 
>>> directory?
>>> There should be a condition checking for DOCUMENTATION_OPTIONS.HAS_SOURCE 
>>> in it.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Can confirm that after I copied searchtools.js (actually did all *.js 
>> just to be sure) from the sphinx/static folder to my documentation 
>> _static folder the search works fine.
>>
>> BTW, it is the manual step one has to do after upgrading Sphinx x to y?  
>> Or should Sphinx detect this during the build process?
>>     
>
> Normally the static files are copied after each build, so I don't know what
> prevented it in your case. If you delete the file and do a build, does Sphinx
> copy it?
>   
When I delete the files from my _static folder in my source tree they do 
get copied by Sphinx to the _static folder in my build tree.

Any reason why one keeps them in the source tree?  Maybe this caused a 
problem with my setup where the static folder is getting copied just 
before the build to handle my "multi" configuration stuff (which I can 
hopefully throw out when 0.6 is out) and maybe Sphinx only checks the 
file date/time and due to the copy the old one looked "newer".

Werner






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to