On 2009-05-02, Georg Brandl wrote: > Guenter Milde schrieb: >>>> I could find out and maybe even fix the manual.cls latex documentclass. >>>> However, I would rather find out who is in charge of this file.
>>> It's in charge of whoever writes patches :) >> * Where to send patches? > Here, or to me directly. I'll see what I can do. ---- >>>> Alternatively, there should be an option to select a documentclass for >>>> LaTeX output. >>> I agree. >> Fine. So I am looking forward to see a "documentclass" config setting >> similar to what we have in Docutils' rst2latex: >> --documentclass=DOCUMENTCLASS >> Specify documentclass. Default is "article". > It should be latex_elements['docclass']. Why docclass instead of the established name documentclass (used in LaTeX and Docutils)? >> This could be supplemented with a "stylesheet" setting: >> --stylesheet=<file[,file2, ...]> Specify comma separated list of >> LaTeX packages/stylesheets. >> A style is referenced with \usepackage if >> extension is ".sty" or omitted and with \input else. > However, this is already subsumed by latex_elements['preamble']. But 'preamble' expects raw LaTeX code (if I remember right). So, are Sphinx and Docutils inevitabely drifting apart? Günter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
