Guenter Milde schrieb: > On 2009-05-02, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Guenter Milde schrieb: > >>>>> I could find out and maybe even fix the manual.cls latex documentclass. >>>>> However, I would rather find out who is in charge of this file. > >>>> It's in charge of whoever writes patches :) > >>> * Where to send patches? > >> Here, or to me directly. > > I'll see what I can do.
Thanks! >>>>> Alternatively, there should be an option to select a documentclass for >>>>> LaTeX output. > >>>> I agree. > >>> Fine. So I am looking forward to see a "documentclass" config setting >>> similar to what we have in Docutils' rst2latex: > >>> --documentclass=DOCUMENTCLASS >>> Specify documentclass. Default is "article". > >> It should be latex_elements['docclass']. > > Why docclass instead of the established name documentclass (used in LaTeX > and Docutils)? It's already there :) >>> This could be supplemented with a "stylesheet" setting: > >>> --stylesheet=<file[,file2, ...]> Specify comma separated list of >>> LaTeX packages/stylesheets. >>> A style is referenced with \usepackage if >>> extension is ".sty" or omitted and with \input else. > >> However, this is already subsumed by latex_elements['preamble']. > > But 'preamble' expects raw LaTeX code (if I remember right). Yes. > So, are Sphinx and Docutils inevitabely drifting apart? It won't "drift apart" more with this change; Sphinx has always had a different approach to configuration, using conf.py instead of options to sphinx-build, and this should not be an exception. cheers, Georg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
