On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Mike Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sage (http://www.sagemath.org/doc/) does use Sphinx's default markup
> (although not idiomatically in many cases due to autoconversion from a
> previous markup.) However, a patch was just accepted to allow $...$
> to delimit math mode.
But sage doesn't use the :param: style for parameters, does it? It
uses all-caps for informal section delimiting and regular bullet lists
(with dashes) for parameters (this is from the 'factor' docstring):
INPUT:
- ``n`` - an nonzero integer
- ``proof`` - bool or None (default: None)
I make the precision because I interpreted the OP's question as asking
about a project that would be using all the :param: & friends
machinery, not just avoiding post-processing (like numpydoc).
Speaking of the $x$ patch, with Ondrej we're maintaining a few useful
such things on a public github repo:
http://github.com/fperez/lacquer
we hope that as these things stabilize and get cleaned up, we can
upstream them (I'm using that extension a lot, as :math:`x` inline is
simply intolerable for extensive markup).
Cheers,
f
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
