Howdy, On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Oben <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Fernando: Do you know if integrating the numpy doc extension into > Sphinx is in discussion or already in progress?
I don't think it's happened yet, though I only joined this list very recently. But I'm pretty sure nobody in numpy would be opposed to it, we've always talked informally about it being nice if all the various extensions we have floating around got upstreamed, it's just a matter of making it happen. If there's interest from the sphinx devs, I'm happy to drop a line on the numpy list about it, to query in case someone has any more plans or thoughts on the matter. Honestly I think the numpy standard is quite acceptable, and I'd love it if more and more projects adopted it. It came to be after a fair amount of discussion on the numpy list, so even if not perfect (nothing is), I think it's a very reasonable solution to the problem, and one that's already at least used by: numpy, scipy, ipython (partly, we still have a bunch of epydoc leftovers), nipy (including the core nipy code and the 'children' projects nipype and nitime). I haven't checked, but I wouldn't be surprised if several of the scikits also use it. Cheers, f --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
