Never mind, I figured something out. In my source .rst file, I changed
.. literalinclude:: tennis.espdf to .. include:: tennis.espdf :literal: :tab-width: 3 Is "literalinclude" a sphinx convenience directive? Because it's not mentioned in http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html, and if literalinclude just saves you one line but leads to problems / lack of documentation, then I don't see the point in using it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
