On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:38, Chris Withers <[email protected]> wrote: > What "it" are you referring to?
Well, the tests, using manuel. Although only the >>> tests. >> However, it still completely refuses to execute any codeblock stuff >> (or at least reports no error, even though the code is invalid). It's >> also not clear to me how the output of a codeblock would be tested. > > Manuel's codeblock execution is exactly that, output is ignored and > lost. However, exceptions will propagate through, so they and > particularly hidden code blocks make for great testing.. Well, I don't get any errors, so probably the codeblock isn't executed. And I don't want the output to be ignored, just not rendered in the final output. It seems the most reasonable path forward for me is to extend Sphinx so it can use other parsers. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
