On 2009-12-30, Lennart Regebro wrote: > And here is another phat tip for others: Use xelatex instead of > pdflatex, because it actually has sane font handling, so you can > select fonts that isn't already amongst those that LaTeX knows about > without going insane.
However, * if you are satisfied with the selection of fonts on provided for LaTeX (see http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/), and * have no special Unicode requirements you might prefer the traditional pdftex: * provides professional `microtype`__ layout features (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtype), * faster, * well supported and widely available, __ http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/microtype/microtype.pdf That said: how did you produce the xelatex source? Is this possible with standard sphinx? (I am asking, as I plan to code a xetex writer for Docutils.) Günter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
