On Thursday 10 December 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > Yes, that particular assignment should be mutex-protected. > > > > The original patch shouldn't really have removed it; the > > change to the device_create() signature was addressing a > > slightly different race. > > should i send a patch, or you going to fix it up ? i would simply > restore the mutex code like it was before ...
send a patch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
