On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:55:39PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Mark Brown >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Allow the use of the S3C64xx SPI controller with things like PMICs by >> > moving the init up to subsys_initcall(). > >> Couldn't any user ever need to load it as a module? >> If no, we might as well drop the s3c64xx_spi_exit and s3c64xx_spi_remove > > This doesn't prevent building as a module - when built as a module > subsys_initcall() is identical to module_init(), the change will only > affect the order in which things are done when the code is built into > the kernel otherwise it's a noop. I didn't know that, thanks for the info.
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <[email protected]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
