On 06/18/2012 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge wrote: > The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer > of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c. > > This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to defer. > > Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <[email protected]> > > --- > Applies to 3.5-rc3 > > Should this patch be joined with gpiolib-of's patch to of_get_named_gpio()? Or > should they just be issued as a series? > > drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c > @@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, co > for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++) { > int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i); > > - if (cs_gpio == -ENODEV) { > + if (cs_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > status = -EPROBE_DEFER; > goto err_no_gpio; > }
You can ignore this patch, Alexandre will merge this into his yet-unapplied patch to support dt in spi-pl022. Sorry for the noise, Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
