On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roland Stigge <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The patch to gpiolib-of.c providing -EPROBE_DEFER as a hint to defer >> of_get_named_gpio*() to a later probe() breaks spi-pl022.c. >> >> This patch adjusts to this change, using -EPROBE_DEFER as indication to >> defer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <[email protected]> >> Should this patch be joined with gpiolib-of's patch to of_get_named_gpio()? >> Or >> should they just be issued as a series? > > If it's not bisectable unless you change this in the same patch then join > them. Else I'd put them in a series and try to figure out a good tree for > merging them. Ok, so lets keep the original patch as is for now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
