On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
>>> for sparc.
>>>
>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
>>
>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
>
> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.

I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
knickers in a knot if you insist.

g.

--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general

Reply via email to