From: Grant Likely <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Grant Likely <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000 >> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the >>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function >>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable >>>> for sparc. >>>> >>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the >>>> corresponding subsystem trees. >>> >>> They should go through the subsystem trees. >> >> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks. > > I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my > knickers in a knot if you insist. That's fine: Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
