On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:01:33PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > If including 100% of the details has obvious negative effects > (restrictions on participation) but 99% does not, then include 99%. > That's still a massive improvement on the recent 0%s. If anything in > the 1% is new but not urgent, acknowledge it and defer any final > decisions.
I'm not going to address your main point above in this email, but the recent meeting announcements, including the 3-day advance notice for the December meeting, did have more than 0% information on the agenda. In fact, it included the URL for the entire agenda as of the sending of that email. Admittedly it would be slightly preferable if at least the summary schedule of the meeting was included in the email, requiring a visit to the URL only to see full resolution texts, but either way it's still a reasonable means of informing the SPI membership. Speaking only for myself, it doesn't bother me greatly that I have to visit a URL to see the agenda, but I can see how it's not maximally optimal. - Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
