At 09:37 AM 11/8/2007, Stasyszen, Jerry wrote: >Actually, in Oklahoma City USA we are paying 3.02 per gallon. And, while gas >may be equivalent to 8.02 per gallon in the UK you cannot walk across the US >in a day or two like you can in England. The UK is not a large country, UK >cars are small and fuel efficient, our dumbass administration refuses to force >US manufacturers to raise fuel economy standards, (might hurt their profits). > >That is what make you think >Jerry
Why should the Government force companies to make a certain type of vehicle? Cars in Europe are more fuel-efficient because gas costs $6-8 gallon. It costs that much because the Governments over there TAX it heavily. Just like here, car companies sell what people want to buy. Very few people in America want 1.2l VW's at even $3/gal. People whine about the cost of gas, then go and buy 10mpg Tahoes. Obviously, the price of gas is not THAT big a deal to them. Government interference through fuel economy standards is largely responsible for the rise of the SUV. Since they were considered trucks, they were exempt from CAFE calculations. This allowed car companies to produce the large, heavy, damn-the-fuel-economy luxo-barges that the American consumer seems to crave. And the were sooo profitable too. Just a different form-factor. And realistically - why shouldn't they when gas is so ridiculously cheap here? Handling dynamics don't matter much in a country where most of the roads are either dead-straight highways or gridlocked with congestion. I am all for more expensive gas - I think $5-6/gal will bring a smattering of rationality to folk's car buying decisions. Of course, here in the States raising the gas tax is political suicide. Not that I don't agree with your assessment of our current administration.... :-) Kevin Rhodes Westbrook, Maine Freddy the Spitfire (~35 mpg on the highway) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.team.net/donate.html [email protected] http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires
