> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jake Holland > Sent: Monday, 11 August, 2008 14:11 > > I don't suppose anybody knows of a list of c99 constructs > that splint does not support properly?
I don't, but there's a handy short list of what C99 changed from the previous standard at: http://home.datacomm.ch/t_wolf/tw/c/c9x_changes.html That would help write a shorter set of tests. (I'd put a suite together myself if I weren't tied up with about a million other things right now.) -- Michael Wojcik Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus _______________________________________________ splint-discuss mailing list splint-discuss@mail.cs.virginia.edu http://www.cs.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/splint-discuss
