Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this
list
Hi Parrish:
My NRD-545 web page has some links:
http://www.prc68.com/I/NRD545.shtml
Also see:
http://www.prc68.com/I/Ant.shtml <- Antennas
http://www.prc68.com/I/HF_Prop.html <- propagation
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
Parrish S. Knight wrote:
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this
list
Thank you for the information. This is a lot more involved than I would have
thought.
Do you know of any good web sites or other resources that give reviews for
radios and antennas (and any other important items that would go along with
them)? I don’t think I’ll be able to afford any major purchases until the
government decides to let me go back to work *growl* but I can at least take
some time to read up on the subject.
On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this
list
Hi Parrish:
The antenna is just as important as the radio.
For receive applications the T2FD is hard to beat (and also for many transmit
applications).
http://www.prc68.com/I/RCS-5A.shtml#T2FD
I claim that using a chirp receiver is the best way to evaluate a receive
antenna.
A key radio specification is the IF bandwidth, the narrower the better for
detecting a signal.
Of course the IF needs to be as wide as the signal to hear the modulation.
For example the HP 4395A spectrum analyzer has a true 1Hz RBW, it's my most
sensitive instrument.
http://www.prc68.com/I/4395A.shtml#SA
The NRD545 has a 10 Hz IF BW, which is the narrowest receiver I have.
http://www.prc68.com/I/NRD545.shtml
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
Parrish S. Knight wrote:
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this
list
On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Ted Van Beurden wrote:
Wouldn't be any point. A shortwave receiver covers more freqs (unless things
have changed) and should receive just as well as a ham receiver. Unless you
just want to listen to hams. Just my view.
I’m mostly just mulling things over. I’m new to shortwave and don’t take it
very seriously, but I’m finding myself kind of annoyed at my astoundingly bad
fortune in picking up number stations with my Grundig G5 with a whip antenna.
I’d like to figure out whether it’s because I need a better antenna, or a
better radio, or because I’m overlooking something else, or simply because I’m
doing something wrong. I’d say it’s most likely the last one, but even so, I
want to look at the other possibilities as well.
______________________________________________________________
Spooks mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Spooks mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Spooks mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Spooks mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
