Charles L. Dischinger wrote: > I have the distinct feeling that the majority of those people on the SPORRS > list or to thin skinned to be subjected to a critiquing. I had attempted > to get some of this started by using one of my shots as the basis for > discussion. If I had chosen a shot taken by someone else, I am most > certain that it would have been taken as an insult.
You hit the nail on the head !! However, I really think that we need to find a way to get these discussions going in a way that won't insult anybody. I sense that Dave will be reluctant to keep this site going forever just so that we can have a bunch of nice pictures to look at through our browser. > > Citiquing is difficult if you can't talk about what is lacking along with > what works! And both are needed. If we all just say that every picture is nice, it is a truly pointless discussion ! > I would think the topic could be enlightening for everyone > involved as long as ways are discussed to show how the improvements could > be made. Ideas anyone ?? How can we get this sort of thing going ?? Is the problem wih us or with the format ?? Robert Palmer -> SPORRS: 'Serious Photographers Of Railroad Related Subjects' -> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/ -> Message © 1998 SPORRS® - All Rights Reserved
