======================================================= -> This is The 'SPORRS' Mailing List -> Info File: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/infosporrs.htm -> Note: Remember to include your name in each list post or reply. -> Please delete all unnecessary quoted text from the original message! =======================================================
Don Bowen wrote: > I have been trying to get HIGH QUALITY glossy, bordered 8x10 color prints > published for years with minimal success. There are two reasons for this: 1. Flatbed scanning (technology issue), and 2. Handling/filing the prints. Note: 35mm film is scanned in film scanners, not flatbed scanners - large transparencies can be exceptions - and drum scans are great, but like everything else, you are at the mercy of the machine operator. 1. Reflective surface (flatbed scans): It is much easier to get a good (tonal range) B&W flatbed scan from a print in 256 shades of gray or even 8 bits per RGB channel, than it is to get a good color flatbed scan unless you have a high end machine scanning at 12 bits per channel with a good optical density of at least 3.4 (and you need to scan at least at 1.8x to 2x the line screen to be printed at on paper - which takes enough out of an image with dot gain and other variables). And simply, color flatbed (reflective) scans don't look as vibrant and sharp as a scan of the actual film, because you are in effect making a copy from a non transparent print. Don't copy a copy when you can scan the original. You will get more information in your file to work with. Sure you can get shots published from prints, but this simply isn't the industry norm because it's not quite the same. If the (lack of) quality of your actual paper or publication printing process cancels out any benefit to the best possible scans, then you can get away with less file information (flatbed scans). Railfan publications are not printed at a high enough line screen (like expensive books usually are) to benefit from some of the best scan qualities. 2. Storing prints is also a problem. Publications that do not devote file space to your print submission don't return your prints for a convenience feature: they throw them away, assuming that they were submitted as copies. Dave Cohen Photographer, Member ASMP Action Photographic Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/home/ ======================================================= -> SPORRS: 'Serious Photographers Of Railroad Related Subjects' -> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/ -> Message © 1998 SPORRS® - All Rights Reserved =======================================================
