Dear All, As was suggested earlier ( Tue., 01 July 2014 ) ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/current/msg00915.html )
it may be useful to include a statement like the following sentence in Sec. 6 (Interoperability with non-SPRING nodes) of the SPRING problem statement draft (draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01.txt). Interoperability with openFlow ( https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/onf-specifications/openflow ) based non-SPRING nodes will be discussed in a future document. Note that currently there are two drafts discussing SPRING-OpenFlow interworking .. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-khc-spring-openflow-interworking-use-cases/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-khc-spring-openflow-interworking-req/ Many thanks for kind consideration. Best. Bhumip, Mr. Hu and Hakki On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > As agreed at the last in person meeting, this message starts the Working > Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement. This call will > close by EOD (pick your favorite time zone) on October 8, 2014. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement > > Please provide specific feedback as to why you support (or not) the > advancement of this draft. Please avoid "+1"-type responses. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
