Hello, This draft provides a clear description of the use cases and their requirements. Just a minor comment: there are still few empty/TBD sections .
I would suggest adding the following: 9. IANA Considerations This document does not require any action from IANA 10. Manageability Considerations I would point to spring architecture document for manageability considerations, or remove this section. 11. Security Considerations The security considerations are described in Section 8. Other than that I support the advancement of this document. Regards Roberta From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana) Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:29 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement Hi! As agreed at the last in person meeting, this message starts the Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement. This call will close by EOD (pick your favorite time zone) on October 8, 2014. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement Please provide specific feedback as to why you support (or not) the advancement of this draft. Please avoid "+1"-type responses. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
