Stefano,
I'm fine with that, but I guess that the SPRING wg chairs and/or the
rtg AD's need to make the consensus call on that.
/Loa
On 2014-09-29 16:00, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
Sasha,
I did NOT mean to imply that this discussion in the MPLS wg should
wait until the SPRING wg last call, on the contrary if the answer to
my question is that this a domain wide label, then it has to be brought
to the MPLS wg BEFORE this is adopted as a SPRING wg document.
I agree with you and the answer is "no" we don't want to bring a discussion
about domain-wide labels because this is not a requirement of segment routing.
s.
/Loa
On 2014-09-29 14:28, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
I concur with you that this requires discussion in the MPLS WG, and I am not
sure such a discussion should be postponed until the SPRING WG LC.
--
Loa Andersson email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert [email protected]
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
Loa Andersson email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert [email protected]
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
