Hi all, This document defines a mechanism that enables the identification of SR paths (i.e., end-to-end flows) and so allows counting at a different granularity. But it doesn't define specific statistics, nor does it set out other uses (such as OAM) for identifying SR paths. I appreciate the enthusiasm for working on new statistics and the YANG model augmentation. I hope we can all pitch in and do that. But I think that belongs in a separate document from where the path identifier is defined. Do you all want to sit down in Singapore and talk through the model augmentation. Adrian From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani Sent: 03 November 2017 12:42 To: Acee Lindem (acee) Cc: [email protected]; Adrian Farrel; Shraddha Hegde Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 I would suggest that the draft define the augmentation of the SR yang model. Operationally, defining the statistics without defining how they can be retrieved does not make sense.
Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected] On Nov 3, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Shraddha, If your SR traffic statistics draft progresses, the ietf-segment-routing model would need to be augmented. I don’t see having the YANG model augmentations as a prerequisite. Thanks, Acee From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 11:53 PM To: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 Mahesh, I have only seen https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang for YANG and it does not have Anything related to traffic statistics counters AFAIK. Is there any other model that I am not aware of? Rgds Shraddha From: Mahesh Jethanandani [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 8:53 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 Shraddha, Could this traffic accounting format be represented as a YANG module? If so, can it be part of an existing SR YANG module or would you define a new model? On Nov 3, 2017, at 12:14 AM, Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]> wrote: Chairs, I would like to request a 10 min slot to present the below draft. <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dhegde-2Dspring-2Dtraffic-2Daccounting-2Dfor-2Dsr-2Dpaths-2D01&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=-qbSPtOSkJdMwB1l9hkiqa9-N3yK1guGZ2mpiIW2xTw&s=0T_gwWUhvIuteydQEocfAwWi4FkB-D4Xzz500OjQX5Q&e=> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths-01 Thanks Shraddha _______________________________________________ spring mailing list <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_spring&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=-qbSPtOSkJdMwB1l9hkiqa9-N3yK1guGZ2mpiIW2xTw&s=eF-gCphLyrNGcGxX4dv7nZ17v70Fikym6wj_kqW37IY&e=> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
