Hi, As an author of the SR Yang model, I'd be interested in this discussion in Singapore.
Thanks, Yingzhen From: Mahesh Jethanandani To: Adrian Farell<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Adrian Farrel<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;Acee Lindem (acee)<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;Shraddha Hegde<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 Time: 2017-11-03 10:03:55 Ok. I have to admit the title of the draft threw me off, where it says "Traffic Accounting for MPLS Segment Routing Paths”, while it really means “Mechanisms for Traffic Accounting in MPLS Segment Routing Paths”. Regardless, I agree that the actual statistics could belong in another draft from this one, and I would happy to discuss this in Singapore. Cheers. On Nov 3, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, This document defines a mechanism that enables the identification of SR paths (i.e., end-to-end flows) and so allows counting at a different granularity. But it doesn't define specific statistics, nor does it set out other uses (such as OAM) for identifying SR paths. I appreciate the enthusiasm for working on new statistics and the YANG model augmentation. I hope we can all pitch in and do that. But I think that belongs in a separate document from where the path identifier is defined. Do you all want to sit down in Singapore and talk through the model augmentation. Adrian From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani Sent: 03 November 2017 12:42 To: Acee Lindem (acee) Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Adrian Farrel; Shraddha Hegde Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 I would suggest that the draft define the augmentation of the SR yang model. Operationally, defining the statistics without defining how they can be retrieved does not make sense. Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> On Nov 3, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Shraddha, If your SR traffic statistics draft progresses, the ietf-segment-routing model would need to be augmented. I don’t see having the YANG model augmentations as a prerequisite. Thanks, Acee From: spring <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 11:53 PM To: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 Mahesh, I have only seen https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang for YANG and it does not have Anything related to traffic statistics counters AFAIK. Is there any other model that I am not aware of? Rgds Shraddha From: Mahesh Jethanandani [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 8:53 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100 Shraddha, Could this traffic accounting format be represented as a YANG module? If so, can it be part of an existing SR YANG module or would you define a new model? On Nov 3, 2017, at 12:14 AM, Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Chairs, I would like to request a 10 min slot to present the below draft. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths-01<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dhegde-2Dspring-2Dtraffic-2Daccounting-2Dfor-2Dsr-2Dpaths-2D01&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=-qbSPtOSkJdMwB1l9hkiqa9-N3yK1guGZ2mpiIW2xTw&s=0T_gwWUhvIuteydQEocfAwWi4FkB-D4Xzz500OjQX5Q&e=> Thanks Shraddha _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_spring&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=-qbSPtOSkJdMwB1l9hkiqa9-N3yK1guGZ2mpiIW2xTw&s=eF-gCphLyrNGcGxX4dv7nZ17v70Fikym6wj_kqW37IY&e=> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
