Am 01.03.18 um 16:01 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
Seeking your feedback here. Regarding Section 7.1, The intent of the
document is to describe one suggestive way and do not attempt to
standardize any suggested mechanisms based considering the Informational
nature. Authors do not attempt to fully solve – but to indicate how SR
helps towards this.The details of how the hosts figure out what paths to
take through the network such that the TCP and application are not
affected is outside the scope of this document.
Would you prefer to add perhaps - “details outside the scope” or “this
is one of the ways” or something else?
Since the cited paper is really old and there is no up-to-date proof of
any working implementation with real Internet traffic: Please remove
This will require a lot of theoretical work, discussions the transport
community, discussions with operating system vendors and testing in the
wild open Internet.
spring mailing list