Hi Gaurav,

Am 01.03.18 um 16:01 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
Hey Martin,

Seeking your feedback here. Regarding Section 7.1, The intent of the document is to describe one suggestive way and do not attempt to standardize any suggested mechanisms based considering the Informational nature. Authors do not attempt to fully solve – but to indicate how SR helps towards this.The details of how the hosts figure out what paths to take through the network such that the TCP and application are not affected is outside the scope of this document.

Would you prefer to add perhaps - “details outside the scope” or “this is one of the ways” or something else?


Since the cited paper is really old and there is no up-to-date proof of any working implementation with real Internet traffic: Please remove this part.

This will require a lot of theoretical work, discussions the transport community, discussions with operating system vendors and testing in the wild open Internet.

Kind regards,

  Martin

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to