Working Group, February 1st the MPLS working Group requested that draft-ietf-mpls- spring-entropy-label should be published as an Informational RFC.
During the RTG Directorate and AD reviews the question whether the document should instead be published as a RFC on the Standards Track has been raised. The decision to make the document Informational was taken "a long time ago", based on discussions between the authors and involving the document shepherd, on the wg mailing list. At that point it we were convinced that the document should be progressed as an Informational document. It turns out that there has been such changes to the document that we now would like to request input from the working group if we should make the document a Standards Track RFC. Daniele's RTG Directorate review can be found at at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-08-rtgdir-lc-ceccarelli-2018-02-21/ All the issues, with the exception whether it should be Informational or Standards track, has been resolved as part AD review. If the document is progressed as a Standard Tracks document then we also need to answer the question whether this is an update RFC 6790. This mail starts a one week poll (ending May 9) to see if we have support to make the document a Standards Track document. If you support placing it on the Standards Track also consider if it is an update to RFC 6790. Please send your comments to the MPLS wg mailing list ( [email protected] ). /Loa for the mpls wf co-chairs PS I'm copying the spring working group on this mail. -- Loa Andersson email: [email protected] Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
