Loa,

There’s plenty of RFC 2119 language in the draft, so I support making this
standards track.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Loa Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
> February 1st the MPLS working Group requested that draft-ietf-mpls-
> spring-entropy-label should be published as an Informational RFC.
>
> During the RTG Directorate and AD reviews the question whether the
> document should instead be published as a RFC on the Standards Track
> has been raised.
>
> The decision to make the document Informational was taken "a long time
> ago", based on discussions between the authors and involving the
> document shepherd, on the wg mailing list. At that point it we were
> convinced that the document should be progressed as an Informational
> document.
>
> It turns out that there has been such changes to the document that we
> now would like to request input from the working group if we should make
> the document a Standards Track RFC.
>
> Daniele's RTG Directorate review can be found at at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-spring-ent
> ropy-label-08-rtgdir-lc-ceccarelli-2018-02-21/
>
> All the issues, with the exception whether it should be Informational
> or Standards track, has been resolved as part AD review.
>
> If the document is progressed as a Standard Tracks document then we
> also need to answer the question whether this is an update RFC 6790.
>
> This mail starts a one week poll (ending May 9) to see if we have
> support to make the document a Standards Track document. If you support
> placing it on the Standards Track also consider if it is an update to
> RFC 6790.
>
> Please send your comments to the MPLS wg mailing list ( [email protected] ).
>
> /Loa
> for the mpls wf co-chairs
>
> PS
>
> I'm copying the spring working group on this mail.
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [email protected]
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to