Folks,
I thought we had an agreement to remove the O-bit. As ZhiBo Hu points
out other drafts drops it.
The obvious reason to not use an O-bit is that if it ever is part of
what an multipath functions hash on it will csue OAM traffic and
"normal" traffic to use different paths. This defeats the idea with
OAM traffic.
/Loa
On 2018-05-16 06:56, Huzhibo wrote:
Hi,
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 says The OAM packets are identified by
setting the O-bit in SRH，But I Notice the latest
I-D.6man-segment-routing-headerhas removed O-bit in the SRH extension
header. I want to confirm that draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 will also
remove o-bit or keep the o-bit in the later version?
Ths
ZhiBo Hu
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
Loa Andersson email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
